This Board Rocks  

Go Back   This Board Rocks > Daily Hits > Carolina Panthers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #81  
Old 11-19-09, 10:16 AM
chipshot's Avatar
chipshot chipshot is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Boise
Posts: 33,526
I think it was spotted a little short of where it should have been but still not a first down. When he left the ground to make the catch his foot was literally just barely past the line and he was leaning forward back towards the line of scrimmage and moving in that same direction.

So at best he first touched it at the first down line, then bobbled while his momentum carried him the wrong way. You don't have possession until you touch the ground right? He didn't get possession, pass the line and then got driven back... so it wouldn't seem the forward momentum argument could be applied.


I don't think they could have won a challenge.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 11-19-09, 11:17 AM
JJT's Avatar
JJT JJT is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 426
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2b View Post
looking at the replay... bobble, catch, tackled... 1st down

he brought the ball to his chest before getting took to the ground while still across the 30 yard line
It would make it all the sweeter if they really did get hosed.
__________________
Live Music Is Best
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 11-19-09, 01:34 PM
Pi.'s Avatar
Pi. Pi. is offline
New and improved Pi.
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by chipshot View Post
I think it was spotted a little short of where it should have been but still not a first down. When he left the ground to make the catch his foot was literally just barely past the line and he was leaning forward back towards the line of scrimmage and moving in that same direction.

So at best he first touched it at the first down line, then bobbled while his momentum carried him the wrong way. You don't have possession until you touch the ground right? He didn't get possession, pass the line and then got driven back... so it wouldn't seem the forward momentum argument could be applied.


I don't think they could have won a challenge.
He had possesion in the air and was contacted by a defender stopping his forward progress. At that point the officials determine where he was once he had possesion and was contacted stopping progress. You don't need feet down in that situation.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 11-19-09, 06:30 PM
magnus's Avatar
magnus magnus is offline
Chump-proof
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
Posts: 48,982
you need feet down to have posession.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 11-19-09, 06:35 PM
Piper's Avatar
Piper Piper is offline
phishin member
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnus View Post
you need feet down to have posession.
Feet down to ensure a completion. But not forward progress.

If you jump in the air, catch the ball at the 31, get hit and land in bounds at the 29, you get the ball at the 31.

In this case, there was a short bobble as he was pushed backwards. The ref saw the bobble, and had to determine the spot where he gained control. That's the tough part.

We are talking 6 inches one way or another.
__________________
"אל-קאעידה: הפיגוע הבא בארה''ב - קרוב" - Dukey
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 11-19-09, 07:34 PM
chipshot's Avatar
chipshot chipshot is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Boise
Posts: 33,526
Assume a receiver is running straight back towards the qb jumps catches beyond first down but lands short of first down runs and is tackled short. What's that? Not saying that's what happened, just curious
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 11-19-09, 07:56 PM
Pi.'s Avatar
Pi. Pi. is offline
New and improved Pi.
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by chipshot View Post
Assume a receiver is running straight back towards the qb jumps catches beyond first down but lands short of first down runs and is tackled short. What's that? Not saying that's what happened, just curious
Forward progress has to be stopped by a defender.

If forward progress is stopped by a defensive hit and the receiver stays on his feet and begins losing yardage on his own, then he is no longer awarded forward progress.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 11-19-09, 07:57 PM
Pi.'s Avatar
Pi. Pi. is offline
New and improved Pi.
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnus View Post
you need feet down to have posession.
I'm saying you don't need feet down to determine the mark of the ball. The player can obtain forward progress in the air.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 11-19-09, 07:59 PM
Pi.'s Avatar
Pi. Pi. is offline
New and improved Pi.
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piper View Post
Feet down to ensure a completion. But not forward progress.

If you jump in the air, catch the ball at the 31, get hit and land in bounds at the 29, you get the ball at the 31.

In this case, there was a short bobble as he was pushed backwards. The ref saw the bobble, and had to determine the spot where he gained control. That's the tough part.

We are talking 6 inches one way or another.
The problem was the ref making the call saw the original bobble then lost sight of the play so he marked the ball where Faulk landed. From the other side of the field you can see Faulk gain control almost immediately.

He bobbled it briefly then had possession right at the marker. It would have been close.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 11-20-09, 12:05 AM
magnus's Avatar
magnus magnus is offline
Chump-proof
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
Posts: 48,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pi. View Post
I'm saying you don't need feet down to determine the mark of the ball. The player can obtain forward progress in the air.
Not if you don't have posession. He had his feet down close to the marker, but he didn't have the ball secure.


Doesn't really matter. Tell me a single time.

any time at all.

Any.

Any.

Any.

Any single time a referee has overruled his own spot.

Bold call, wasn't a first down.
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 11-20-09, 12:30 AM
Pi.'s Avatar
Pi. Pi. is offline
New and improved Pi.
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnus View Post
Not if you don't have posession. He had his feet down close to the marker, but he didn't have the ball secure.


Doesn't really matter. Tell me a single time.

any time at all.

Any.

Any.

Any.
Any single time a referee has overruled his own spot.

Bold call, wasn't a first down.
Wow, you're angry after another pathetic Panther performance and probably all hopped up on 3 or 4 Belgian wheat summer ales.

I think you are confused as to position and responsibility of officials. Spots are reviewed and corrected often. You won't see the referee overrule his spot because the referee does not spot the ball.

The official that spotted the ball was a line judge. He would not be reviewing anything. The referee is the crew chief and he would be the official reviewing the play and making a decision. He generally stands behind the QB and views the field without much movement.

In this case, the line judge stepped in and made a poor spot. It may not have been a first down but it was close and he would not have been the one reviewing the spot of the ball.

I am constantly amazed by the level of football ignorance on this board.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 11-20-09, 12:35 AM
magnus's Avatar
magnus magnus is offline
Chump-proof
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
Posts: 48,982
He didn't have posession of the football past the first down marker, which seems to me to be something you'd need to call that a first down. But, way to try to make it about me. I don't think I was on the fucking field.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 11-20-09, 12:37 AM
tharan000's Avatar
tharan000 tharan000 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 9,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pi. View Post
Wow, you're angry after another pathetic Panther performance and probably all hopped up on 3 or 4 Belgian wheat summer ales.
LMFAO

You are totally outclassed, MagAnus.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 11-20-09, 12:39 AM
magnus's Avatar
magnus magnus is offline
Chump-proof
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
Posts: 48,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by tharan000 View Post
LMFAO

You are totally outclassed, Magnus.
he can try to make it about me all day, but it wasn't a first down. You silly little troll.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 11-20-09, 12:41 AM
tharan000's Avatar
tharan000 tharan000 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 9,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnus View Post
You silly little troll.
Don't get your sphincter all twisted, bitch. It's not about me.

You lose again.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 11-20-09, 12:43 AM
Black&Blue's Avatar
Black&Blue Black&Blue is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eyjafjallakokull
Posts: 19,193
WELL WHY DON'T YOU POST ANOTHER GAY YOUTUBE TO PROVE IT!?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 11-20-09, 12:43 AM
magnus's Avatar
magnus magnus is offline
Chump-proof
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
Posts: 48,982
oh yeah. That's right. If I respond to you you think you won. OK. Congrats! I responded to your weak attempt at...I really don't know what the fuck this is actually. Get interesting or shut the fuck up already. I'm sure there are plenty of people around you need to pretend to care whether you try to troll them.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 11-20-09, 08:59 AM
Pi.'s Avatar
Pi. Pi. is offline
New and improved Pi.
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnus View Post
he can try to make it about me all day, but it wasn't a first down. You silly little troll.
Make it about you? You made it about yourself by "challenging" me to find any example of a referee overturning his own spot of the football.

I just pointed out that you are cluless because the line judge made the spot and the referee is the only official that reviews plays.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 11-20-09, 12:16 PM
Piper's Avatar
Piper Piper is offline
phishin member
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by chipshot View Post
Assume a receiver is running straight back towards the qb jumps catches beyond first down but lands short of first down runs and is tackled short. What's that? Not saying that's what happened, just curious
If he's going backward of his own accord, he'd be stopped where he was tackled in that situation. Smitty had one of those last night where he caught the ball at one point, but his momentum kept him going back toward the line of scrimage, and he was short of the first down.
__________________
"אל-קאעידה: הפיגוע הבא בארה''ב - קרוב" - Dukey
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 11-20-09, 01:22 PM
magnus's Avatar
magnus magnus is offline
Chump-proof
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
Posts: 48,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pi. View Post
Make it about you? You made it about yourself by "challenging" me to find any example of a referee overturning his own spot of the football.

I just pointed out that you are cluless because the line judge made the spot and the referee is the only official that reviews plays.
spots don't get overruled almost as a hard rule. you have to prove the official didn't judge correctly based on what he saw.

But, either way you can be unhappy about "being challenged"...it won't make it a first down.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
football genius, grady little, the turf is on fire


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.